Monday, January 17, 2005

Spokane gays push for own district

. . . Opponents argue from ignorance, stupidity, poor reading comprehension. Fear "culture based upon sex"; missing basic genetic truism that all cultures are based on sex.
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
The Inland Northwest Business Alliance is working to grow a dedicated gay district somewhere in Spokane and citizens are worried there will be a proliferation of lewd and wanton sex acts all over the place. I just found out about this yesterday. I might have known about it sooner if the Spokesman-Review let people read their paper online without also subscribing to the print edition.

I'm surprised there hasn't been more outcry. Maybe Spokane is more progressive than I thought, or maybe the people here just don't feel the imminence of the threat. Maybe now that the Times has brought word to that trans-mountain Sodom in the west, people here will start worrying. Seattle is, after all, where all Spokane's crime and minorities come from. Seattle and California.

The push from the usually quiet gay community--which is in the messy thought-diagram on a large sheet of butcher paper stage--has its share of detractors among Spokane's much larger and more vocal bigot and moron communities. Many people (as perhaps litmus for the Midwest in general) still adhere with shock and horror to the idea that homosexuals are promiscuous Petri dishes for communicable disease. They are, I guess, but no more so than heterosexuals. People who think queers bring something vile and seedy to any community they inhabit don't know any queers, or at least don't know that they know any queers. That's why this is going to be perfect.

As long as the gay community remains silent, "closeted," as is says it has in Spokane, witch-hunting heteros are able to foster any kind of image they want. Until queers stand up and dispel the myths woven by an ignorant and excitable conservative majority, the myths will persist. We've seen this kind of thing twice before in minority communities. Both Blacks and Chinese have been victims of the sex-crazed savage image. Both images, of African Americans driven feral by their massive copulatory organs and the smokey, dragon-shaped monkey on the back of every Chinaman in Chinatown, weren't dispelled until the communities themselves spoke up. The same thing has happened in larger gay communities nation wide and now finally, hopefully, it's happening here.

One man is worried that his "pro-family conventions" are going to go away, presumably leaving only the troublesome anti-family conventions. Another is worried about Spokane no longer being thought of as a good place to raise a family. But the funny thing is, it doesn't matter. The new gay district, if it happens, isn't going to be open to caucusing or public discourse, it's going to be created in exactly the way conservatives want the nation run, with market forces and private money. It's not going to be some morally bereft braintrust of liberals deeding public land to an oppressed group. It's going to be a bunch of queers applying for small-business loans and purchasing real estate and growing businesses and turning a small corner of Spokane into a safe place where they can raise families. How creating communities without fear makes for a less family-friendly city, I don't know.

Now, allow me to prognosticate: Once the district is up and chugging along, slowly at first I'm sure, there might be an influx of homosexual men and women. After that, when violent and sexual crime rates do not go up, people will gradually lose some of their ignorant fear, left with only more general ignorance. Then, after a sufficient amount of time has passed and the memory of the fear is gone, they'll start coming to Queer Street because the Trading Post has cheap organic food, Gayspresso has fair-trade coffee and/or because the fag bakery makes a mean ciabatta. And, once there, on the street, they might bump into Bob, from church, or Chandra, from accounts payable. Nice people who, strangely, don't act the way fundamentalist pastors and legislators say gay people act. They're nice, law-abiding, god-fearing human beings, more or less just like you, trying to make a buck and live their lives. You might still be uncomfortable with who and how they love, what they do behind closed doors, but the thing is, they're doing it behind closed doors, where it can't bother you.

Then, when you hear from your racketball buddy that he read in the local conservative newspaper that queers, on average, make more money than straight people, you decide it might be a good idea to market to them.

And pretty soon, Queer Street's not so much a gay enclave as it is a nice, upscale neighborhood with good food and culture and lots of nice new potential clients and customers. Then, before you know it, Spokane is for real a better place to live, for a lot more people.

Bigotry will never go away, but this is a good first step toward dispelling and reversing ignorance.

6 Comments:

At 2:58 PM, Blogger Omni said...

But... but... doesn't EVERY city have a gay section already? Why would ANYONE believe that Spokane is an exception? What difference does it make if gays have an "official" district there? :-O

 
At 3:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know that this is just in the 'thought-bubble' stage, but do you know where they want to put it? The SPI story didn't seem to have any idea.

My award for most unnecessary reporting comes with this snippet:

Community Impact Spokane, a network of evangelical Christians, is appalled.

"A gay Mecca is not what we'd like to see Spokane marketed as," said Penny Lancaster, director of the group. "I'd rather see us promoted as a conservative, family-oriented community without any reference to sexual orientation."
Holy shit. That's totally not what I would expect to hear from the leader of a network of evangelical Christians ... no ... wait. Duh. I guess they couldn't get Hitler's ghost for a soundbyte.

In any case, I think your analysis is completely correct. For better or for worse (in this case, better) exposure breeds tolerance. That's just a coping mechanism. The fact that a gay district would almost certainly be a nice (ly designed with emminently tasteful track-lighting) area is of secondary importance to the societal impact of having some more openly gay folks around and the community at large interacting with them

What is really tiresome about this story is hearing all the reasons why a gay district shouldn't be there. For instance, Morgan's letter to the Spokesman claiming that a gay-friendly image would drive away pro-family conventions. What's that, one hundred hotel reservations for a night or two for each convention? It's not like those conventions are even selling anything besides an ignorant ideology. The last time I checked, none of those groups have developed homo repellant, and, hence, it's mighty difficult to buy that fictional product from Spokane's small businesses. I'm sure the bath-oil and mustache-grooming conventions that will come in the place of the bigotry conventions will provide a much bigger shot in the arm to the economy. Besides, it seems to me like the bigger the 'gay problem' is, the more the city needs a convention of religious zealots to scare the populace. Everybody wins.

Why don't they just come out and tell it straight (no pun intended): "We don't like gays." That's all I read when I look at their rambling (micro-economically unsound) arguments about why the 'faggerts' should be kept out. Fuck. I have an idea, how about they just don't patronize those businesses, resist the urge to restore antique furniture, and, above all things, refrain from having gay sex. That way, the gay district and gay-ness shouldn't really affect them in any way.

--Mike Sheffler
... turning to the 3-D map, we see an unmistakable cone of ignorance

 
At 3:12 PM, Blogger Luke said...

There's some truth to that, but I think they're specifically working to get something like Capitol Hill in Seattle or Castro in San Fran. It's not like there's going to be an official distinction--it wouldn't be officially official anyway, as mentioned.

It's more about being a visible and vocal community in a way, I think, that the gay community hasn't been before in Spokane. That link to the Inland Northwest Business Alliance or whatever has more info, it's a Gay Business association.

 
At 11:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If they're going to do this i hope they just DO it (they don't actually need permission do they?) and get it done. The sooner it happens the sooner there will cease to be a public "debate" about it.

Note to Luke: i've read about a dozen letters to the editor about this in the Spokesman-Review, which means i've missed about a hundred more.

The sooner it's actually done the sooner the people that are furious will have to go to just being resentful about whatever part of town the Gay District ends up being. And as has been noted, their tolerance level will gradually rise.

i was pretty surprised to here about this proposition. i know exactly one gay guy in Spokane, but...i know about two dozen people outside our little circle of friends, all from work or family. That means statistically one in every thirty-six people in Spokane is gay. i guess i shouldn't be surprised.

"Seattle is, after all, where all Spokane's crime and minorities come from. Seattle and California." Do Russians count as a minority? If so, put Russia in there with Seattle and California.

Oh, i've been saying this at every opportunity since i heard it, and it seems appropriate now.

"That is the GAYEST thing since Gay came to Gaytown."
-Master Shake, ATHF

-ben

 
At 1:28 AM, Blogger Don Sheffler said...

There isn't already a gay enclave? Huh.
Anyway,,
There's probably no better model for exactly what Luke's pointing out,than Hillcrest in San Diego.
It's been the "gay" part of town as long as anyone can remember. Just a hop, skip, and a jump (pardon the imagery) north of downtown, it's been this quasi upscale bookstore arthouse cafe library theatre gay-clubbin straight-shoppin magazine-publishin loft-owning hot spot where, of course, the gay pride parade breaks out every year. The only obvious crimes (other than the status quo inherent in society at large) is occasional anti-gay thuggery. Go figure.

 
At 7:03 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I read the comments here, and I am pleased that we are gaining attention with what we are doing here in Spokane. But Please!!! The issue isn’t just Gays, its all minorities who have been marginalized in our society, and the vision isn’t just a plan to create a place where gays can be free to express themselves. The goal is to begin to educate the white middle class that if they don’t open their doors to more diversity, they run the risk of becoming a stagnant economy, and for Spokane that’s not that far away. According to Richard Florida (the Creative Class), Talent, Technology and Tolerance are all necessary for a modern community to flourish. In the ten years between the 1990 and 2000, Spokane experienced a 10% increase in population while Boise Idaho increased by 30%.
Florida highlights the statistics of his own city, Pittsburg, Pa. Pittsburgh was an industrial Mecca in the mid 20th century, and the envy of many other cities, however in the last three decades, population slowed, stopped, and in the last decade actually lost population. Although Pittsburg has numerous fine universities (lots of new talent), and lots of technology opportunities, graduates continue to flee to places like Austin Texas, San Francisco bay area, Seattle Washington and Boise Idaho. All of these cities also have talent and technological opportunities, but what they also have that Pittsburg lacks is visible tolerance and cultural variety. Interviews with those new grads who leave Pittsburg reveals that they want to live in integrated and progressive cities where there is a sense of cultural authenticity, active night life and an opportunity to pursue exercise and recreation that fits their life style. Stadiums and national sports teams aren’t what primarily appeal to the creative class. They prefer rest and recreation which can be accesses 24 / 7. Many enjoy activities like bicycling, hiking, listening to live music, visiting book stores and fine restaurants. They also wanted to be able to meet people from diverse cultures, and also people with like minds. Its seems that these are the things that Pittsburg hasn’t seemed to be able to convey to it’s own citizens.
Spokane is a bastion of conservatism compared to the Seattle area. We too have many good universities, and technological opportunities, but like Pittsburg it’s diversity populations remain marginalized, and thus Spokane remains marginalized. Some will probably say that inviting diversity is tantamount to inviting increased crime, gangs and drug problems, but Spokane already has all of that (big time!) Some will also say that a family friendly diversity community amounts to creating a ghetto, but once again Spokane already has an area or two that might be considered ghettos. What Florida’s research indicates, and what Boise Idaho demonstrates is that if a community is willing to broaden it’s cultural appeal, the economy will flourish, new jobs will be created, and areas that have fallen into decline will come back to life.

Lorin Miller

 

Post a Comment

<< Home